Wiki › Aftermath vs Arcus
Aftermath vs Arcus: which perp DEX is better?
A side-by-side comparison of Aftermath and Arcus on fees, leverage, volume, chain and token.
| Aftermath | Arcus |
|---|
| 24h volume | n/a | $75M |
| Maker fee | n/a | n/a |
| Taker fee | n/a | n/a |
| Max leverage | n/a | 50x |
| Model | Orderbook | Orderbook |
| Chain | Sui | Robinhood Chain (Arbitrum L2) |
| Token | No token | No token |
| Assets | Crypto, Forex, Commodities | Crypto, Commodities, Stocks |
Aftermath vs Arcus: which should you choose?
If your priority is cost, Aftermath wins on taker fees (n/a). For maximum leverage, Arcus goes up to 50x. For depth and liquidity, Arcus trades the most volume of the two. Both are pre-token, so either could reward early activity with a future airdrop.
Aftermath runs a orderbook on Sui, while Arcus runs a orderbook on Robinhood Chain (Arbitrum L2). Read the full profiles: Aftermath and Arcus.
FAQ
- Is Aftermath or Arcus cheaper?
- Aftermath has the lower taker fee (n/a vs n/a). Funding rates also affect total cost, so check both before trading.
- Which has higher leverage, Aftermath or Arcus?
- Arcus offers more, up to 50x, versus n/a. Higher leverage means higher liquidation risk.
- Which is bigger, Aftermath or Arcus?
- Arcus has more listed 24h volume ($75M), which usually means deeper liquidity and less slippage.
More comparisons
Not financial advice. Volume figures are compiled from each venue's public data on our
live rankings and may lag; fees, leverage and token status are curated and can change. Always verify on the exchange before trading. Perpetual futures are high risk and leverage can liquidate your position.