Wiki › Gains Network vs Aftermath
Gains Network vs Aftermath: which perp DEX is better?
A side-by-side comparison of Gains Network and Aftermath on fees, leverage, volume, chain and token.
| Gains Network | Aftermath |
| 24h volume | n/a | n/a |
| Maker fee | n/a | n/a |
| Taker fee | n/a | n/a |
| Max leverage | 150x | n/a |
| Model | Pool | Orderbook |
| Chain | Arbitrum, Base, Polygon | Sui |
| Token | $GNS | No token |
| Assets | Crypto, Forex, Stocks, Commodities | Crypto, Forex, Commodities |
Gains Network vs Aftermath: which should you choose?
If your priority is cost, Gains Network wins on taker fees (n/a). For maximum leverage, Gains Network goes up to 150x. For depth and liquidity, Gains Network trades the most volume of the two.
Gains Network runs a pool on Arbitrum, Base, Polygon, while Aftermath runs a orderbook on Sui. Read the full profiles: Gains Network and Aftermath.
FAQ
- Is Gains Network or Aftermath cheaper?
- Gains Network has the lower taker fee (n/a vs n/a). Funding rates also affect total cost, so check both before trading.
- Which has higher leverage, Gains Network or Aftermath?
- Gains Network offers more, up to 150x, versus n/a. Higher leverage means higher liquidation risk.
- Which is bigger, Gains Network or Aftermath?
- Gains Network has more listed 24h volume (n/a), which usually means deeper liquidity and less slippage.
More comparisons
Not financial advice. Volume figures are compiled from each venue's public data on our
live rankings and may lag; fees, leverage and token status are curated and can change. Always verify on the exchange before trading. Perpetual futures are high risk and leverage can liquidate your position.