Wiki › GMX vs Aftermath

GMX vs Aftermath: which perp DEX is better?

A side-by-side comparison of GMX and Aftermath on fees, leverage, volume, chain and token.

GMXAftermath
24h volume$175Mn/a
Maker fee4 bpsn/a
Taker fee6 bpsn/a
Max leverage100xn/a
ModelPoolOrderbook
ChainArbitrumSui
Token$GMXNo token
AssetsCryptoCrypto, Forex, Commodities

GMX vs Aftermath: which should you choose?

If your priority is cost, GMX wins on taker fees (6 bps). For maximum leverage, GMX goes up to 100x. For depth and liquidity, GMX trades the most volume of the two.

GMX runs a pool on Arbitrum, while Aftermath runs a orderbook on Sui. Read the full profiles: GMX and Aftermath.

FAQ

Is GMX or Aftermath cheaper?
GMX has the lower taker fee (6 bps vs n/a). Funding rates also affect total cost, so check both before trading.
Which has higher leverage, GMX or Aftermath?
GMX offers more, up to 100x, versus n/a. Higher leverage means higher liquidation risk.
Which is bigger, GMX or Aftermath?
GMX has more listed 24h volume ($175M), which usually means deeper liquidity and less slippage.

More comparisons

Not financial advice. Volume figures are compiled from each venue's public data on our live rankings and may lag; fees, leverage and token status are curated and can change. Always verify on the exchange before trading. Perpetual futures are high risk and leverage can liquidate your position.