Wiki › GMX vs ApeX Protocol
GMX vs ApeX Protocol: which perp DEX is better?
A side-by-side comparison of GMX and ApeX Protocol on fees, leverage, volume, chain and token.
| GMX | ApeX Protocol |
|---|
| 24h volume | $175M | $1.30B |
| Maker fee | 4 bps | 2 bps |
| Taker fee | 6 bps | 5 bps |
| Max leverage | 100x | 100x |
| Model | Pool | Orderbook |
| Chain | Arbitrum | Multichain (zkLink) |
| Token | $GMX | $APEX |
| Assets | Crypto | Crypto |
GMX vs ApeX Protocol: which should you choose?
If your priority is cost, ApeX Protocol wins on taker fees (5 bps). For maximum leverage, GMX goes up to 100x. For depth and liquidity, ApeX Protocol trades the most volume of the two.
GMX runs a pool on Arbitrum, while ApeX Protocol runs a orderbook on Multichain (zkLink). Read the full profiles: GMX and ApeX Protocol.
FAQ
- Is GMX or ApeX Protocol cheaper?
- ApeX Protocol has the lower taker fee (5 bps vs 6 bps). Funding rates also affect total cost, so check both before trading.
- Which has higher leverage, GMX or ApeX Protocol?
- GMX offers more, up to 100x, versus 100x. Higher leverage means higher liquidation risk.
- Which is bigger, GMX or ApeX Protocol?
- ApeX Protocol has more listed 24h volume ($1.30B), which usually means deeper liquidity and less slippage.
More comparisons
Not financial advice. Volume figures are compiled from each venue's public data on our
live rankings and may lag; fees, leverage and token status are curated and can change. Always verify on the exchange before trading. Perpetual futures are high risk and leverage can liquidate your position.