Wiki › GRVT vs ApeX Protocol
GRVT vs ApeX Protocol: which perp DEX is better?
A side-by-side comparison of GRVT and ApeX Protocol on fees, leverage, volume, chain and token.
| GRVT | ApeX Protocol |
|---|
| 24h volume | $503M | $1.30B |
| Maker fee | 0.5 bps | 2 bps |
| Taker fee | 3.5 bps | 5 bps |
| Max leverage | 50x | 100x |
| Model | Orderbook | Orderbook |
| Chain | zkSync L2 | Multichain (zkLink) |
| Token | $GRVT | $APEX |
| Assets | Crypto | Crypto |
GRVT vs ApeX Protocol: which should you choose?
If your priority is cost, GRVT wins on taker fees (3.5 bps). For maximum leverage, ApeX Protocol goes up to 100x. For depth and liquidity, ApeX Protocol trades the most volume of the two.
GRVT runs a orderbook on zkSync L2, while ApeX Protocol runs a orderbook on Multichain (zkLink). Read the full profiles: GRVT and ApeX Protocol.
FAQ
- Is GRVT or ApeX Protocol cheaper?
- GRVT has the lower taker fee (3.5 bps vs 5 bps). Funding rates also affect total cost, so check both before trading.
- Which has higher leverage, GRVT or ApeX Protocol?
- ApeX Protocol offers more, up to 100x, versus 50x. Higher leverage means higher liquidation risk.
- Which is bigger, GRVT or ApeX Protocol?
- ApeX Protocol has more listed 24h volume ($1.30B), which usually means deeper liquidity and less slippage.
More comparisons
Not financial advice. Volume figures are compiled from each venue's public data on our
live rankings and may lag; fees, leverage and token status are curated and can change. Always verify on the exchange before trading. Perpetual futures are high risk and leverage can liquidate your position.