GRVT vs Arcus: which perp DEX is better?
A side-by-side comparison of GRVT and Arcus on fees, leverage, volume, chain and token.
| GRVT | Arcus |
|---|
| 24h volume | $503M | $75M |
| Maker fee | 0.5 bps | n/a |
| Taker fee | 3.5 bps | n/a |
| Max leverage | 50x | 50x |
| Model | Orderbook | Orderbook |
| Chain | zkSync L2 | Robinhood Chain (Arbitrum L2) |
| Token | $GRVT | No token |
| Assets | Crypto | Crypto, Commodities, Stocks |
GRVT vs Arcus: which should you choose?
If your priority is cost, GRVT wins on taker fees (3.5 bps). For maximum leverage, GRVT goes up to 50x. For depth and liquidity, GRVT trades the most volume of the two.
GRVT runs a orderbook on zkSync L2, while Arcus runs a orderbook on Robinhood Chain (Arbitrum L2). Read the full profiles: GRVT and Arcus.
FAQ
- Is GRVT or Arcus cheaper?
- GRVT has the lower taker fee (3.5 bps vs n/a). Funding rates also affect total cost, so check both before trading.
- Which has higher leverage, GRVT or Arcus?
- GRVT offers more, up to 50x, versus 50x. Higher leverage means higher liquidation risk.
- Which is bigger, GRVT or Arcus?
- GRVT has more listed 24h volume ($503M), which usually means deeper liquidity and less slippage.
More comparisons
Not financial advice. Volume figures are compiled from each venue's public data on our
live rankings and may lag; fees, leverage and token status are curated and can change. Always verify on the exchange before trading. Perpetual futures are high risk and leverage can liquidate your position.