Bluefin vs GMX: which perp DEX is better?
A side-by-side comparison of Bluefin and GMX on fees, leverage, volume, chain and token.
| Bluefin | GMX |
|---|
| 24h volume | $120M | $175M |
| Maker fee | 0.5 bps | 4 bps |
| Taker fee | 4.5 bps | 6 bps |
| Max leverage | 50x | 100x |
| Model | Orderbook | Pool |
| Chain | Sui | Arbitrum |
| Token | $BLUE | $GMX |
| Assets | Crypto | Crypto |
Bluefin vs GMX: which should you choose?
If your priority is cost, Bluefin wins on taker fees (4.5 bps). For maximum leverage, GMX goes up to 100x. For depth and liquidity, GMX trades the most volume of the two.
Bluefin runs a orderbook on Sui, while GMX runs a pool on Arbitrum. Read the full profiles: Bluefin and GMX.
FAQ
- Is Bluefin or GMX cheaper?
- Bluefin has the lower taker fee (4.5 bps vs 6 bps). Funding rates also affect total cost, so check both before trading.
- Which has higher leverage, Bluefin or GMX?
- GMX offers more, up to 100x, versus 50x. Higher leverage means higher liquidation risk.
- Which is bigger, Bluefin or GMX?
- GMX has more listed 24h volume ($175M), which usually means deeper liquidity and less slippage.
More comparisons
Not financial advice. Volume figures are compiled from each venue's public data on our
live rankings and may lag; fees, leverage and token status are curated and can change. Always verify on the exchange before trading. Perpetual futures are high risk and leverage can liquidate your position.