Wiki › Bluefin vs Hibachi
Bluefin vs Hibachi: which perp DEX is better?
A side-by-side comparison of Bluefin and Hibachi on fees, leverage, volume, chain and token.
| Bluefin | Hibachi |
|---|
| 24h volume | $120M | $24M |
| Maker fee | 0.5 bps | 0 bps |
| Taker fee | 4.5 bps | 4.5 bps |
| Max leverage | 50x | n/a |
| Model | Orderbook | Orderbook |
| Chain | Sui | Base (Celestia DA, ZK) |
| Token | $BLUE | No token |
| Assets | Crypto | Crypto |
Bluefin vs Hibachi: which should you choose?
If your priority is cost, Bluefin wins on taker fees (4.5 bps). For maximum leverage, Bluefin goes up to 50x. For depth and liquidity, Bluefin trades the most volume of the two.
Bluefin runs a orderbook on Sui, while Hibachi runs a orderbook on Base (Celestia DA, ZK). Read the full profiles: Bluefin and Hibachi.
FAQ
- Is Bluefin or Hibachi cheaper?
- Bluefin has the lower taker fee (4.5 bps vs 4.5 bps). Funding rates also affect total cost, so check both before trading.
- Which has higher leverage, Bluefin or Hibachi?
- Bluefin offers more, up to 50x, versus n/a. Higher leverage means higher liquidation risk.
- Which is bigger, Bluefin or Hibachi?
- Bluefin has more listed 24h volume ($120M), which usually means deeper liquidity and less slippage.
More comparisons
Not financial advice. Volume figures are compiled from each venue's public data on our
live rankings and may lag; fees, leverage and token status are curated and can change. Always verify on the exchange before trading. Perpetual futures are high risk and leverage can liquidate your position.