Bluefin vs Vest: which perp DEX is better?
A side-by-side comparison of Bluefin and Vest on fees, leverage, volume, chain and token.
| Bluefin | Vest |
|---|
| 24h volume | $120M | n/a |
| Maker fee | 0.5 bps | 0 bps |
| Taker fee | 4.5 bps | 0 bps |
| Max leverage | 50x | 50x |
| Model | Orderbook | Pool |
| Chain | Sui | zkRisk appchain |
| Token | $BLUE | No token |
| Assets | Crypto | Crypto, Stocks, Forex |
Bluefin vs Vest: which should you choose?
If your priority is cost, Vest wins on taker fees (0 bps). For maximum leverage, Bluefin goes up to 50x. For depth and liquidity, Bluefin trades the most volume of the two.
Bluefin runs a orderbook on Sui, while Vest runs a pool on zkRisk appchain. Read the full profiles: Bluefin and Vest.
FAQ
- Is Bluefin or Vest cheaper?
- Vest has the lower taker fee (0 bps vs 4.5 bps). Funding rates also affect total cost, so check both before trading.
- Which has higher leverage, Bluefin or Vest?
- Bluefin offers more, up to 50x, versus 50x. Higher leverage means higher liquidation risk.
- Which is bigger, Bluefin or Vest?
- Bluefin has more listed 24h volume ($120M), which usually means deeper liquidity and less slippage.
More comparisons
Not financial advice. Volume figures are compiled from each venue's public data on our
live rankings and may lag; fees, leverage and token status are curated and can change. Always verify on the exchange before trading. Perpetual futures are high risk and leverage can liquidate your position.