Drift vs Hibachi: which perp DEX is better?
A side-by-side comparison of Drift and Hibachi on fees, leverage, volume, chain and token.
| Drift | Hibachi |
|---|
| 24h volume | $280M | $24M |
| Maker fee | -0.5 bps | 0 bps |
| Taker fee | 4 bps | 4.5 bps |
| Max leverage | 20x | n/a |
| Model | Orderbook | Orderbook |
| Chain | Solana | Base (Celestia DA, ZK) |
| Token | $DRIFT | No token |
| Assets | Crypto | Crypto |
Drift vs Hibachi: which should you choose?
If your priority is cost, Drift wins on taker fees (4 bps). For maximum leverage, Drift goes up to 20x. For depth and liquidity, Drift trades the most volume of the two.
Drift runs a orderbook on Solana, while Hibachi runs a orderbook on Base (Celestia DA, ZK). Read the full profiles: Drift and Hibachi.
FAQ
- Is Drift or Hibachi cheaper?
- Drift has the lower taker fee (4 bps vs 4.5 bps). Funding rates also affect total cost, so check both before trading.
- Which has higher leverage, Drift or Hibachi?
- Drift offers more, up to 20x, versus n/a. Higher leverage means higher liquidation risk.
- Which is bigger, Drift or Hibachi?
- Drift has more listed 24h volume ($280M), which usually means deeper liquidity and less slippage.
More comparisons
Not financial advice. Volume figures are compiled from each venue's public data on our
live rankings and may lag; fees, leverage and token status are curated and can change. Always verify on the exchange before trading. Perpetual futures are high risk and leverage can liquidate your position.