Wiki › Extended vs Hibachi
Extended vs Hibachi: which perp DEX is better?
A side-by-side comparison of Extended and Hibachi on fees, leverage, volume, chain and token.
| Extended | Hibachi |
|---|
| 24h volume | $110M | $24M |
| Maker fee | 0.5 bps | 0 bps |
| Taker fee | 3 bps | 4.5 bps |
| Max leverage | 50x | n/a |
| Model | Orderbook | Orderbook |
| Chain | Starknet L2 | Base (Celestia DA, ZK) |
| Token | No token | No token |
| Assets | Crypto | Crypto |
Extended vs Hibachi: which should you choose?
If your priority is cost, Extended wins on taker fees (3 bps). For maximum leverage, Extended goes up to 50x. For depth and liquidity, Extended trades the most volume of the two. Both are pre-token, so either could reward early activity with a future airdrop.
Extended runs a orderbook on Starknet L2, while Hibachi runs a orderbook on Base (Celestia DA, ZK). Read the full profiles: Extended and Hibachi.
FAQ
- Is Extended or Hibachi cheaper?
- Extended has the lower taker fee (3 bps vs 4.5 bps). Funding rates also affect total cost, so check both before trading.
- Which has higher leverage, Extended or Hibachi?
- Extended offers more, up to 50x, versus n/a. Higher leverage means higher liquidation risk.
- Which is bigger, Extended or Hibachi?
- Extended has more listed 24h volume ($110M), which usually means deeper liquidity and less slippage.
More comparisons
Not financial advice. Volume figures are compiled from each venue's public data on our
live rankings and may lag; fees, leverage and token status are curated and can change. Always verify on the exchange before trading. Perpetual futures are high risk and leverage can liquidate your position.