Extended vs Vest: which perp DEX is better?
A side-by-side comparison of Extended and Vest on fees, leverage, volume, chain and token.
| Extended | Vest |
|---|
| 24h volume | $110M | n/a |
| Maker fee | 0.5 bps | 0 bps |
| Taker fee | 3 bps | 0 bps |
| Max leverage | 50x | 50x |
| Model | Orderbook | Pool |
| Chain | Starknet L2 | zkRisk appchain |
| Token | No token | No token |
| Assets | Crypto | Crypto, Stocks, Forex |
Extended vs Vest: which should you choose?
If your priority is cost, Vest wins on taker fees (0 bps). For maximum leverage, Extended goes up to 50x. For depth and liquidity, Extended trades the most volume of the two. Both are pre-token, so either could reward early activity with a future airdrop.
Extended runs a orderbook on Starknet L2, while Vest runs a pool on zkRisk appchain. Read the full profiles: Extended and Vest.
FAQ
- Is Extended or Vest cheaper?
- Vest has the lower taker fee (0 bps vs 3 bps). Funding rates also affect total cost, so check both before trading.
- Which has higher leverage, Extended or Vest?
- Extended offers more, up to 50x, versus 50x. Higher leverage means higher liquidation risk.
- Which is bigger, Extended or Vest?
- Extended has more listed 24h volume ($110M), which usually means deeper liquidity and less slippage.
More comparisons
Not financial advice. Volume figures are compiled from each venue's public data on our
live rankings and may lag; fees, leverage and token status are curated and can change. Always verify on the exchange before trading. Perpetual futures are high risk and leverage can liquidate your position.