Wiki › Gains Network vs Hibachi
Gains Network vs Hibachi: which perp DEX is better?
A side-by-side comparison of Gains Network and Hibachi on fees, leverage, volume, chain and token.
| Gains Network | Hibachi |
|---|
| 24h volume | n/a | $24M |
| Maker fee | n/a | 0 bps |
| Taker fee | n/a | 4.5 bps |
| Max leverage | 150x | n/a |
| Model | Pool | Orderbook |
| Chain | Arbitrum, Base, Polygon | Base (Celestia DA, ZK) |
| Token | $GNS | No token |
| Assets | Crypto, Forex, Stocks, Commodities | Crypto |
Gains Network vs Hibachi: which should you choose?
If your priority is cost, Hibachi wins on taker fees (4.5 bps). For maximum leverage, Gains Network goes up to 150x. For depth and liquidity, Hibachi trades the most volume of the two.
Gains Network runs a pool on Arbitrum, Base, Polygon, while Hibachi runs a orderbook on Base (Celestia DA, ZK). Read the full profiles: Gains Network and Hibachi.
FAQ
- Is Gains Network or Hibachi cheaper?
- Hibachi has the lower taker fee (4.5 bps vs n/a). Funding rates also affect total cost, so check both before trading.
- Which has higher leverage, Gains Network or Hibachi?
- Gains Network offers more, up to 150x, versus n/a. Higher leverage means higher liquidation risk.
- Which is bigger, Gains Network or Hibachi?
- Hibachi has more listed 24h volume ($24M), which usually means deeper liquidity and less slippage.
More comparisons
Not financial advice. Volume figures are compiled from each venue's public data on our
live rankings and may lag; fees, leverage and token status are curated and can change. Always verify on the exchange before trading. Perpetual futures are high risk and leverage can liquidate your position.