Wiki › Gains Network vs Vest
Gains Network vs Vest: which perp DEX is better?
A side-by-side comparison of Gains Network and Vest on fees, leverage, volume, chain and token.
| Gains Network | Vest |
|---|
| 24h volume | n/a | n/a |
| Maker fee | n/a | 0 bps |
| Taker fee | n/a | 0 bps |
| Max leverage | 150x | 50x |
| Model | Pool | Pool |
| Chain | Arbitrum, Base, Polygon | zkRisk appchain |
| Token | $GNS | No token |
| Assets | Crypto, Forex, Stocks, Commodities | Crypto, Stocks, Forex |
Gains Network vs Vest: which should you choose?
If your priority is cost, Vest wins on taker fees (0 bps). For maximum leverage, Gains Network goes up to 150x. For depth and liquidity, Gains Network trades the most volume of the two.
Gains Network runs a pool on Arbitrum, Base, Polygon, while Vest runs a pool on zkRisk appchain. Read the full profiles: Gains Network and Vest.
FAQ
- Is Gains Network or Vest cheaper?
- Vest has the lower taker fee (0 bps vs n/a). Funding rates also affect total cost, so check both before trading.
- Which has higher leverage, Gains Network or Vest?
- Gains Network offers more, up to 150x, versus 50x. Higher leverage means higher liquidation risk.
- Which is bigger, Gains Network or Vest?
- Gains Network has more listed 24h volume (n/a), which usually means deeper liquidity and less slippage.
More comparisons
Not financial advice. Volume figures are compiled from each venue's public data on our
live rankings and may lag; fees, leverage and token status are curated and can change. Always verify on the exchange before trading. Perpetual futures are high risk and leverage can liquidate your position.