Ostium vs GMX: which perp DEX is better?
A side-by-side comparison of Ostium and GMX on fees, leverage, volume, chain and token.
| Ostium | GMX |
|---|
| 24h volume | $80M | $175M |
| Maker fee | 2 bps | 4 bps |
| Taker fee | 5 bps | 6 bps |
| Max leverage | 200x | 100x |
| Model | AMM / Pool | Pool |
| Chain | Arbitrum | Arbitrum |
| Token | No token | $GMX |
| Assets | Commodities, Forex, Stocks | Crypto |
Ostium vs GMX: which should you choose?
If your priority is cost, Ostium wins on taker fees (5 bps). For maximum leverage, Ostium goes up to 200x. For depth and liquidity, GMX trades the most volume of the two.
Ostium runs a amm / pool on Arbitrum, while GMX runs a pool on Arbitrum. Read the full profiles: Ostium and GMX.
FAQ
- Is Ostium or GMX cheaper?
- Ostium has the lower taker fee (5 bps vs 6 bps). Funding rates also affect total cost, so check both before trading.
- Which has higher leverage, Ostium or GMX?
- Ostium offers more, up to 200x, versus 100x. Higher leverage means higher liquidation risk.
- Which is bigger, Ostium or GMX?
- GMX has more listed 24h volume ($175M), which usually means deeper liquidity and less slippage.
More comparisons
Not financial advice. Volume figures are compiled from each venue's public data on our
live rankings and may lag; fees, leverage and token status are curated and can change. Always verify on the exchange before trading. Perpetual futures are high risk and leverage can liquidate your position.