GMX vs Perpl: which perp DEX is better?
A side-by-side comparison of GMX and Perpl on fees, leverage, volume, chain and token.
| GMX | Perpl |
|---|
| 24h volume | $175M | $43M |
| Maker fee | 4 bps | 5 bps |
| Taker fee | 6 bps | 8.8 bps |
| Max leverage | 100x | n/a |
| Model | Pool | Orderbook |
| Chain | Arbitrum | Monad |
| Token | $GMX | No token |
| Assets | Crypto | Crypto |
GMX vs Perpl: which should you choose?
If your priority is cost, GMX wins on taker fees (6 bps). For maximum leverage, GMX goes up to 100x. For depth and liquidity, GMX trades the most volume of the two.
GMX runs a pool on Arbitrum, while Perpl runs a orderbook on Monad. Read the full profiles: GMX and Perpl.
FAQ
- Is GMX or Perpl cheaper?
- GMX has the lower taker fee (6 bps vs 8.8 bps). Funding rates also affect total cost, so check both before trading.
- Which has higher leverage, GMX or Perpl?
- GMX offers more, up to 100x, versus n/a. Higher leverage means higher liquidation risk.
- Which is bigger, GMX or Perpl?
- GMX has more listed 24h volume ($175M), which usually means deeper liquidity and less slippage.
More comparisons
Not financial advice. Volume figures are compiled from each venue's public data on our
live rankings and may lag; fees, leverage and token status are curated and can change. Always verify on the exchange before trading. Perpetual futures are high risk and leverage can liquidate your position.