Wiki › GMX vs StandX

GMX vs StandX: which perp DEX is better?

A side-by-side comparison of GMX and StandX on fees, leverage, volume, chain and token.

GMXStandX
24h volume$175M$289M
Maker fee4 bps1 bps
Taker fee6 bps4 bps
Max leverage100x25x
ModelPoolOrderbook
ChainArbitrumBNB Chain and Solana
Token$GMXNo token
AssetsCryptoCrypto

GMX vs StandX: which should you choose?

If your priority is cost, StandX wins on taker fees (4 bps). For maximum leverage, GMX goes up to 100x. For depth and liquidity, StandX trades the most volume of the two.

GMX runs a pool on Arbitrum, while StandX runs a orderbook on BNB Chain and Solana. Read the full profiles: GMX and StandX.

FAQ

Is GMX or StandX cheaper?
StandX has the lower taker fee (4 bps vs 6 bps). Funding rates also affect total cost, so check both before trading.
Which has higher leverage, GMX or StandX?
GMX offers more, up to 100x, versus 25x. Higher leverage means higher liquidation risk.
Which is bigger, GMX or StandX?
StandX has more listed 24h volume ($289M), which usually means deeper liquidity and less slippage.

More comparisons

Not financial advice. Volume figures are compiled from each venue's public data on our live rankings and may lag; fees, leverage and token status are curated and can change. Always verify on the exchange before trading. Perpetual futures are high risk and leverage can liquidate your position.