Ostium vs Hibachi: which perp DEX is better?
A side-by-side comparison of Ostium and Hibachi on fees, leverage, volume, chain and token.
| Ostium | Hibachi |
|---|
| 24h volume | $80M | $24M |
| Maker fee | 2 bps | 0 bps |
| Taker fee | 5 bps | 4.5 bps |
| Max leverage | 200x | n/a |
| Model | AMM / Pool | Orderbook |
| Chain | Arbitrum | Base (Celestia DA, ZK) |
| Token | No token | No token |
| Assets | Commodities, Forex, Stocks | Crypto |
Ostium vs Hibachi: which should you choose?
If your priority is cost, Hibachi wins on taker fees (4.5 bps). For maximum leverage, Ostium goes up to 200x. For depth and liquidity, Ostium trades the most volume of the two. Both are pre-token, so either could reward early activity with a future airdrop.
Ostium runs a amm / pool on Arbitrum, while Hibachi runs a orderbook on Base (Celestia DA, ZK). Read the full profiles: Ostium and Hibachi.
FAQ
- Is Ostium or Hibachi cheaper?
- Hibachi has the lower taker fee (4.5 bps vs 5 bps). Funding rates also affect total cost, so check both before trading.
- Which has higher leverage, Ostium or Hibachi?
- Ostium offers more, up to 200x, versus n/a. Higher leverage means higher liquidation risk.
- Which is bigger, Ostium or Hibachi?
- Ostium has more listed 24h volume ($80M), which usually means deeper liquidity and less slippage.
More comparisons
Not financial advice. Volume figures are compiled from each venue's public data on our
live rankings and may lag; fees, leverage and token status are curated and can change. Always verify on the exchange before trading. Perpetual futures are high risk and leverage can liquidate your position.