RISEx vs Hibachi: which perp DEX is better?
A side-by-side comparison of RISEx and Hibachi on fees, leverage, volume, chain and token.
| RISEx | Hibachi |
|---|
| 24h volume | $87M | $24M |
| Maker fee | 0.25 bps | 0 bps |
| Taker fee | 2.5 bps | 4.5 bps |
| Max leverage | 25x | n/a |
| Model | Orderbook | Orderbook |
| Chain | RISE L2 | Base (Celestia DA, ZK) |
| Token | No token | No token |
| Assets | Crypto, Commodities, Stocks | Crypto |
RISEx vs Hibachi: which should you choose?
If your priority is cost, RISEx wins on taker fees (2.5 bps). For maximum leverage, RISEx goes up to 25x. For depth and liquidity, RISEx trades the most volume of the two. Both are pre-token, so either could reward early activity with a future airdrop.
RISEx runs a orderbook on RISE L2, while Hibachi runs a orderbook on Base (Celestia DA, ZK). Read the full profiles: RISEx and Hibachi.
FAQ
- Is RISEx or Hibachi cheaper?
- RISEx has the lower taker fee (2.5 bps vs 4.5 bps). Funding rates also affect total cost, so check both before trading.
- Which has higher leverage, RISEx or Hibachi?
- RISEx offers more, up to 25x, versus n/a. Higher leverage means higher liquidation risk.
- Which is bigger, RISEx or Hibachi?
- RISEx has more listed 24h volume ($87M), which usually means deeper liquidity and less slippage.
More comparisons
Not financial advice. Volume figures are compiled from each venue's public data on our
live rankings and may lag; fees, leverage and token status are curated and can change. Always verify on the exchange before trading. Perpetual futures are high risk and leverage can liquidate your position.