Wiki › Jupiter vs Pacifica
Jupiter vs Pacifica: which perp DEX is better?
A side-by-side comparison of Jupiter and Pacifica on fees, leverage, volume, chain and token.
| Jupiter | Pacifica |
|---|
| 24h volume | $640M | $522M |
| Maker fee | 0 bps | 0.75 bps |
| Taker fee | 6 bps | 2 bps |
| Max leverage | 100x | 50x |
| Model | AMM / Pool | Orderbook |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Token | $JUP | No token |
| Assets | Crypto | Crypto |
Jupiter vs Pacifica: which should you choose?
If your priority is cost, Pacifica wins on taker fees (2 bps). For maximum leverage, Jupiter goes up to 100x. For depth and liquidity, Jupiter trades the most volume of the two.
Jupiter runs a amm / pool on Solana, while Pacifica runs a orderbook on Solana. Read the full profiles: Jupiter and Pacifica.
FAQ
- Is Jupiter or Pacifica cheaper?
- Pacifica has the lower taker fee (2 bps vs 6 bps). Funding rates also affect total cost, so check both before trading.
- Which has higher leverage, Jupiter or Pacifica?
- Jupiter offers more, up to 100x, versus 50x. Higher leverage means higher liquidation risk.
- Which is bigger, Jupiter or Pacifica?
- Jupiter has more listed 24h volume ($640M), which usually means deeper liquidity and less slippage.
More comparisons
Not financial advice. Volume figures are compiled from each venue's public data on our
live rankings and may lag; fees, leverage and token status are curated and can change. Always verify on the exchange before trading. Perpetual futures are high risk and leverage can liquidate your position.