Lighter vs Vest: which perp DEX is better?
A side-by-side comparison of Lighter and Vest on fees, leverage, volume, chain and token.
| Lighter | Vest |
|---|
| 24h volume | $1.00B | n/a |
| Maker fee | 0 bps | 0 bps |
| Taker fee | 2 bps | 0 bps |
| Max leverage | 50x | 50x |
| Model | Orderbook | Pool |
| Chain | zk rollup (Ethereum L2) | zkRisk appchain |
| Token | $LIT | No token |
| Assets | Crypto | Crypto, Stocks, Forex |
Lighter vs Vest: which should you choose?
If your priority is cost, Vest wins on taker fees (0 bps). For maximum leverage, Lighter goes up to 50x. For depth and liquidity, Lighter trades the most volume of the two.
Lighter runs a orderbook on zk rollup (Ethereum L2), while Vest runs a pool on zkRisk appchain. Read the full profiles: Lighter and Vest.
FAQ
- Is Lighter or Vest cheaper?
- Vest has the lower taker fee (0 bps vs 2 bps). Funding rates also affect total cost, so check both before trading.
- Which has higher leverage, Lighter or Vest?
- Lighter offers more, up to 50x, versus 50x. Higher leverage means higher liquidation risk.
- Which is bigger, Lighter or Vest?
- Lighter has more listed 24h volume ($1.00B), which usually means deeper liquidity and less slippage.
More comparisons
Not financial advice. Volume figures are compiled from each venue's public data on our
live rankings and may lag; fees, leverage and token status are curated and can change. Always verify on the exchange before trading. Perpetual futures are high risk and leverage can liquidate your position.