Hibachi vs Arcus: which perp DEX is better?
A side-by-side comparison of Hibachi and Arcus on fees, leverage, volume, chain and token.
| Hibachi | Arcus |
|---|
| 24h volume | $24M | $75M |
| Maker fee | 0 bps | n/a |
| Taker fee | 4.5 bps | n/a |
| Max leverage | n/a | 50x |
| Model | Orderbook | Orderbook |
| Chain | Base (Celestia DA, ZK) | Robinhood Chain (Arbitrum L2) |
| Token | No token | No token |
| Assets | Crypto | Crypto, Commodities, Stocks |
Hibachi vs Arcus: which should you choose?
If your priority is cost, Hibachi wins on taker fees (4.5 bps). For maximum leverage, Arcus goes up to 50x. For depth and liquidity, Arcus trades the most volume of the two. Both are pre-token, so either could reward early activity with a future airdrop.
Hibachi runs a orderbook on Base (Celestia DA, ZK), while Arcus runs a orderbook on Robinhood Chain (Arbitrum L2). Read the full profiles: Hibachi and Arcus.
FAQ
- Is Hibachi or Arcus cheaper?
- Hibachi has the lower taker fee (4.5 bps vs n/a). Funding rates also affect total cost, so check both before trading.
- Which has higher leverage, Hibachi or Arcus?
- Arcus offers more, up to 50x, versus n/a. Higher leverage means higher liquidation risk.
- Which is bigger, Hibachi or Arcus?
- Arcus has more listed 24h volume ($75M), which usually means deeper liquidity and less slippage.
More comparisons
Not financial advice. Volume figures are compiled from each venue's public data on our
live rankings and may lag; fees, leverage and token status are curated and can change. Always verify on the exchange before trading. Perpetual futures are high risk and leverage can liquidate your position.