Wiki › Jupiter vs Hibachi
Jupiter vs Hibachi: which perp DEX is better?
A side-by-side comparison of Jupiter and Hibachi on fees, leverage, volume, chain and token.
| Jupiter | Hibachi |
|---|
| 24h volume | $640M | $24M |
| Maker fee | 0 bps | 0 bps |
| Taker fee | 6 bps | 4.5 bps |
| Max leverage | 100x | n/a |
| Model | AMM / Pool | Orderbook |
| Chain | Solana | Base (Celestia DA, ZK) |
| Token | $JUP | No token |
| Assets | Crypto | Crypto |
Jupiter vs Hibachi: which should you choose?
If your priority is cost, Hibachi wins on taker fees (4.5 bps). For maximum leverage, Jupiter goes up to 100x. For depth and liquidity, Jupiter trades the most volume of the two.
Jupiter runs a amm / pool on Solana, while Hibachi runs a orderbook on Base (Celestia DA, ZK). Read the full profiles: Jupiter and Hibachi.
FAQ
- Is Jupiter or Hibachi cheaper?
- Hibachi has the lower taker fee (4.5 bps vs 6 bps). Funding rates also affect total cost, so check both before trading.
- Which has higher leverage, Jupiter or Hibachi?
- Jupiter offers more, up to 100x, versus n/a. Higher leverage means higher liquidation risk.
- Which is bigger, Jupiter or Hibachi?
- Jupiter has more listed 24h volume ($640M), which usually means deeper liquidity and less slippage.
More comparisons
Not financial advice. Volume figures are compiled from each venue's public data on our
live rankings and may lag; fees, leverage and token status are curated and can change. Always verify on the exchange before trading. Perpetual futures are high risk and leverage can liquidate your position.