Hibachi vs Nado: which perp DEX is better?
A side-by-side comparison of Hibachi and Nado on fees, leverage, volume, chain and token.
| Hibachi | Nado |
|---|
| 24h volume | $24M | $347M |
| Maker fee | 0 bps | 1 bps |
| Taker fee | 4.5 bps | 3.5 bps |
| Max leverage | n/a | 20x |
| Model | Orderbook | Orderbook |
| Chain | Base (Celestia DA, ZK) | Ink (Kraken L2) |
| Token | No token | No token |
| Assets | Crypto | Crypto |
Hibachi vs Nado: which should you choose?
If your priority is cost, Nado wins on taker fees (3.5 bps). For maximum leverage, Nado goes up to 20x. For depth and liquidity, Nado trades the most volume of the two. Both are pre-token, so either could reward early activity with a future airdrop.
Hibachi runs a orderbook on Base (Celestia DA, ZK), while Nado runs a orderbook on Ink (Kraken L2). Read the full profiles: Hibachi and Nado.
FAQ
- Is Hibachi or Nado cheaper?
- Nado has the lower taker fee (3.5 bps vs 4.5 bps). Funding rates also affect total cost, so check both before trading.
- Which has higher leverage, Hibachi or Nado?
- Nado offers more, up to 20x, versus n/a. Higher leverage means higher liquidation risk.
- Which is bigger, Hibachi or Nado?
- Nado has more listed 24h volume ($347M), which usually means deeper liquidity and less slippage.
More comparisons
Not financial advice. Volume figures are compiled from each venue's public data on our
live rankings and may lag; fees, leverage and token status are curated and can change. Always verify on the exchange before trading. Perpetual futures are high risk and leverage can liquidate your position.