Wiki › Pacifica vs Hibachi
Pacifica vs Hibachi: which perp DEX is better?
A side-by-side comparison of Pacifica and Hibachi on fees, leverage, volume, chain and token.
| Pacifica | Hibachi |
|---|
| 24h volume | $522M | $24M |
| Maker fee | 0.75 bps | 0 bps |
| Taker fee | 2 bps | 4.5 bps |
| Max leverage | 50x | n/a |
| Model | Orderbook | Orderbook |
| Chain | Solana | Base (Celestia DA, ZK) |
| Token | No token | No token |
| Assets | Crypto | Crypto |
Pacifica vs Hibachi: which should you choose?
If your priority is cost, Pacifica wins on taker fees (2 bps). For maximum leverage, Pacifica goes up to 50x. For depth and liquidity, Pacifica trades the most volume of the two. Both are pre-token, so either could reward early activity with a future airdrop.
Pacifica runs a orderbook on Solana, while Hibachi runs a orderbook on Base (Celestia DA, ZK). Read the full profiles: Pacifica and Hibachi.
FAQ
- Is Pacifica or Hibachi cheaper?
- Pacifica has the lower taker fee (2 bps vs 4.5 bps). Funding rates also affect total cost, so check both before trading.
- Which has higher leverage, Pacifica or Hibachi?
- Pacifica offers more, up to 50x, versus n/a. Higher leverage means higher liquidation risk.
- Which is bigger, Pacifica or Hibachi?
- Pacifica has more listed 24h volume ($522M), which usually means deeper liquidity and less slippage.
More comparisons
Not financial advice. Volume figures are compiled from each venue's public data on our
live rankings and may lag; fees, leverage and token status are curated and can change. Always verify on the exchange before trading. Perpetual futures are high risk and leverage can liquidate your position.