Hibachi vs StandX: which perp DEX is better?
A side-by-side comparison of Hibachi and StandX on fees, leverage, volume, chain and token.
| Hibachi | StandX |
|---|
| 24h volume | $24M | $289M |
| Maker fee | 0 bps | 1 bps |
| Taker fee | 4.5 bps | 4 bps |
| Max leverage | n/a | 25x |
| Model | Orderbook | Orderbook |
| Chain | Base (Celestia DA, ZK) | BNB Chain and Solana |
| Token | No token | No token |
| Assets | Crypto | Crypto |
Hibachi vs StandX: which should you choose?
If your priority is cost, StandX wins on taker fees (4 bps). For maximum leverage, StandX goes up to 25x. For depth and liquidity, StandX trades the most volume of the two. Both are pre-token, so either could reward early activity with a future airdrop.
Hibachi runs a orderbook on Base (Celestia DA, ZK), while StandX runs a orderbook on BNB Chain and Solana. Read the full profiles: Hibachi and StandX.
FAQ
- Is Hibachi or StandX cheaper?
- StandX has the lower taker fee (4 bps vs 4.5 bps). Funding rates also affect total cost, so check both before trading.
- Which has higher leverage, Hibachi or StandX?
- StandX offers more, up to 25x, versus n/a. Higher leverage means higher liquidation risk.
- Which is bigger, Hibachi or StandX?
- StandX has more listed 24h volume ($289M), which usually means deeper liquidity and less slippage.
More comparisons
Not financial advice. Volume figures are compiled from each venue's public data on our
live rankings and may lag; fees, leverage and token status are curated and can change. Always verify on the exchange before trading. Perpetual futures are high risk and leverage can liquidate your position.