Hibachi vs Vest: which perp DEX is better?
A side-by-side comparison of Hibachi and Vest on fees, leverage, volume, chain and token.
| Hibachi | Vest |
|---|
| 24h volume | $24M | n/a |
| Maker fee | 0 bps | 0 bps |
| Taker fee | 4.5 bps | 0 bps |
| Max leverage | n/a | 50x |
| Model | Orderbook | Pool |
| Chain | Base (Celestia DA, ZK) | zkRisk appchain |
| Token | No token | No token |
| Assets | Crypto | Crypto, Stocks, Forex |
Hibachi vs Vest: which should you choose?
If your priority is cost, Vest wins on taker fees (0 bps). For maximum leverage, Vest goes up to 50x. For depth and liquidity, Hibachi trades the most volume of the two. Both are pre-token, so either could reward early activity with a future airdrop.
Hibachi runs a orderbook on Base (Celestia DA, ZK), while Vest runs a pool on zkRisk appchain. Read the full profiles: Hibachi and Vest.
FAQ
- Is Hibachi or Vest cheaper?
- Vest has the lower taker fee (0 bps vs 4.5 bps). Funding rates also affect total cost, so check both before trading.
- Which has higher leverage, Hibachi or Vest?
- Vest offers more, up to 50x, versus n/a. Higher leverage means higher liquidation risk.
- Which is bigger, Hibachi or Vest?
- Hibachi has more listed 24h volume ($24M), which usually means deeper liquidity and less slippage.
More comparisons
Not financial advice. Volume figures are compiled from each venue's public data on our
live rankings and may lag; fees, leverage and token status are curated and can change. Always verify on the exchange before trading. Perpetual futures are high risk and leverage can liquidate your position.