Jupiter vs Reya: which perp DEX is better?
A side-by-side comparison of Jupiter and Reya on fees, leverage, volume, chain and token.
| Jupiter | Reya |
|---|
| 24h volume | $640M | n/a |
| Maker fee | 0 bps | 0 bps |
| Taker fee | 6 bps | 0 bps |
| Max leverage | 100x | n/a |
| Model | AMM / Pool | Hybrid |
| Chain | Solana | Reya Network (Ethereum L2) |
| Token | $JUP | $REYA |
| Assets | Crypto | Crypto |
Jupiter vs Reya: which should you choose?
If your priority is cost, Reya wins on taker fees (0 bps). For maximum leverage, Jupiter goes up to 100x. For depth and liquidity, Jupiter trades the most volume of the two.
Jupiter runs a amm / pool on Solana, while Reya runs a hybrid on Reya Network (Ethereum L2). Read the full profiles: Jupiter and Reya.
FAQ
- Is Jupiter or Reya cheaper?
- Reya has the lower taker fee (0 bps vs 6 bps). Funding rates also affect total cost, so check both before trading.
- Which has higher leverage, Jupiter or Reya?
- Jupiter offers more, up to 100x, versus n/a. Higher leverage means higher liquidation risk.
- Which is bigger, Jupiter or Reya?
- Jupiter has more listed 24h volume ($640M), which usually means deeper liquidity and less slippage.
More comparisons
Not financial advice. Volume figures are compiled from each venue's public data on our
live rankings and may lag; fees, leverage and token status are curated and can change. Always verify on the exchange before trading. Perpetual futures are high risk and leverage can liquidate your position.