Jupiter vs StandX: which perp DEX is better?
A side-by-side comparison of Jupiter and StandX on fees, leverage, volume, chain and token.
| Jupiter | StandX |
|---|
| 24h volume | $640M | $289M |
| Maker fee | 0 bps | 1 bps |
| Taker fee | 6 bps | 4 bps |
| Max leverage | 100x | 25x |
| Model | AMM / Pool | Orderbook |
| Chain | Solana | BNB Chain and Solana |
| Token | $JUP | No token |
| Assets | Crypto | Crypto |
Jupiter vs StandX: which should you choose?
If your priority is cost, StandX wins on taker fees (4 bps). For maximum leverage, Jupiter goes up to 100x. For depth and liquidity, Jupiter trades the most volume of the two.
Jupiter runs a amm / pool on Solana, while StandX runs a orderbook on BNB Chain and Solana. Read the full profiles: Jupiter and StandX.
FAQ
- Is Jupiter or StandX cheaper?
- StandX has the lower taker fee (4 bps vs 6 bps). Funding rates also affect total cost, so check both before trading.
- Which has higher leverage, Jupiter or StandX?
- Jupiter offers more, up to 100x, versus 25x. Higher leverage means higher liquidation risk.
- Which is bigger, Jupiter or StandX?
- Jupiter has more listed 24h volume ($640M), which usually means deeper liquidity and less slippage.
More comparisons
Not financial advice. Volume figures are compiled from each venue's public data on our
live rankings and may lag; fees, leverage and token status are curated and can change. Always verify on the exchange before trading. Perpetual futures are high risk and leverage can liquidate your position.