Pacifica vs Vest: which perp DEX is better?
A side-by-side comparison of Pacifica and Vest on fees, leverage, volume, chain and token.
| Pacifica | Vest |
|---|
| 24h volume | $522M | n/a |
| Maker fee | 0.75 bps | 0 bps |
| Taker fee | 2 bps | 0 bps |
| Max leverage | 50x | 50x |
| Model | Orderbook | Pool |
| Chain | Solana | zkRisk appchain |
| Token | No token | No token |
| Assets | Crypto | Crypto, Stocks, Forex |
Pacifica vs Vest: which should you choose?
If your priority is cost, Vest wins on taker fees (0 bps). For maximum leverage, Pacifica goes up to 50x. For depth and liquidity, Pacifica trades the most volume of the two. Both are pre-token, so either could reward early activity with a future airdrop.
Pacifica runs a orderbook on Solana, while Vest runs a pool on zkRisk appchain. Read the full profiles: Pacifica and Vest.
FAQ
- Is Pacifica or Vest cheaper?
- Vest has the lower taker fee (0 bps vs 2 bps). Funding rates also affect total cost, so check both before trading.
- Which has higher leverage, Pacifica or Vest?
- Pacifica offers more, up to 50x, versus 50x. Higher leverage means higher liquidation risk.
- Which is bigger, Pacifica or Vest?
- Pacifica has more listed 24h volume ($522M), which usually means deeper liquidity and less slippage.
More comparisons
Not financial advice. Volume figures are compiled from each venue's public data on our
live rankings and may lag; fees, leverage and token status are curated and can change. Always verify on the exchange before trading. Perpetual futures are high risk and leverage can liquidate your position.